The Emerging Future of Crowdsourced Journalismr

Jeff_HoweWe are in the midst of a gigantic experiment in journalism – seeing if crowssourcing can work effectively alongside traditonal reporting.  In a post on hte Online Journalism Review, Robert Niles defined crowdsourced journalism in the following way:

Crowdsourcing, in journalism, is the use of a large group of readers to report a news story. It differs from traditional reporting in that the information collected is gathered not manually, by a reporter or team of reporters, but through some automated agent, such as a website.

In his recent book, Crowdsourcing:  Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, Jeff Howe (right) recounts some examples from the history of crowdsourced journalism, including:

Assignment Zero – Assignment Zero was a short term experiment – the brainchild of Jay Rosen, a professor of journalism at New York University, working in collaboration with WIRED magazine. The idea behind the project was to use the combined skills of a crowd to write a comprehensive report on the growth of crowdsourcing.  While the project failed to meet its original goal of 80 usable articles, it did achieve some modest success and highlighted some of the organizational factors that were important in managing a crowssourced reporting operation. – This political blog posted documents from the investigation into the firing of US attorneys during the Bush administration.  By crowdsourcing the document review to interested citizens, the blog was able to quickly parse through the mass of data to expose potential malfeasance.


Jeff Howe – Crowdsourcing

gas buddy websiteMore recently, we’ve seen numerous examples of Twitter, the micro-blogging service, being used by traditional journalists to get raw materials from a developing story reported by citizens as it unfolds.  The Iranian election protests showed that crowd reporting could effectively counter even strict government constraints on the regular media.  One applications of crowdsourced reporting includes situation where online reports by individuals contribute to a bigger picture view of a story that would be impossible for one reporter or even a small team of reporters to piece together.  Examples cited by Niles include:

  • Earthquake reports across a wide region
  • Reports of gas prices – e.g. during the recent gasoline price bubble
  • Accident Watch – This allowed citizens to report theme park accidents from around the country when such data was not forthcoming from federal or state agencies

citizen journalistJust as newspapers and other media organizations have added bloggers to extend their traditional reporting, it seems likely that crowdsourced journalism will rise as news has to be reported with ever shrinking professional staffs.  The lessons learned from the first experiments in this area show that the most successful partnerships combine the data gathering power of widely dispersed individuals organized into a project based community, supervised by professionals with the appropriate editorial skills and journalistic savvy.

Related Posts
Share this Post

This entry was posted in Journalism & Newspapers, open publishing, readership strategies and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Emerging Future of Crowdsourced Journalismr

  1. Todd Jones says:

    Hi Tom!

    If you interested in crowdsourcing in business, we are co-hosting an online event (including Jeff Howe) on Thursday Sept. 17 at 9am PST to discuss how and when crowdsourcing becomes a mainstream practice for business.

    For more info:

    Attendees also receive a white paper on the future of crowdsourcing in business.

    I can send you an advanced copy of the white paper if you are interested. Let me know.

    Todd Jones

  2. orionwell says:

    Thanks for the information, Todd. I’ll check it out.

  3. Guntur says:

    Great discussion all. I only wish we were having this discourse over a meal and some good wine/spirits.What strikes me in this discussion is that we’re discussing crowd sourcing at the event to create new content. That will and should happen more. Inspired people create inspiring content and conversations when given a place, a time, a medium and a message.There’s no reason the original content can’t be, in part crowd-sourced. The association/planner(s) should be scouring conference feedback channels (not just the survey) to begin content decisions for the next event immediately after the current event ends. Part of that should be reaching out to the community for their ideas, the power to vote and the ability to have A voice in the decision making process.In the Kevin Richardson definition of crowd-sourcing there is a collaboration between show organizer and attendee and exhibitor. All with voices that together create the content that will be meaningful within a greater theme.Once those content touchpoints have been established I think the real work begins for each and every speaker to reach out (again pre-conference) to allow the crowd to help shape the remarks and the collaboration.Finally, dear show organizer, please provide me and my fellow attendees the space, time, medium(s) to openly gather to further this message and drive learning home.All that to say, I don’t see this as poles but rather a true collaboration which while more difficult than either pole is more meaningful to all.I’ll see you in the bean-bag, wi-fi hangout after the session…

  4. Pingback: A New Generation of Government Plumbers Takes on WikiLeaks | Future Perfect Publishing

Leave a Reply to A New Generation of Government Plumbers Takes on WikiLeaks | Future Perfect Publishing Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *